I could be wrong, and Niccolo may need to correct me. but my understanding of the dual monarchy/empire of Austro-Hungary after 1847 and the Kossuth matter, was that Hungary de facto was 'in charge' of what we now call Slovenia and Croatia, maybe Bosnia, northern Serbia (Vojvodina, remember Monica Seles, incidentally stabbed by a German!), and appointed The Ban of Croatia?.
I could be wrong, and Niccolo may need to correct me. but my understanding of the dual monarchy/empire of Austro-Hungary after 1847 and the Kossuth matter, was that Hungary de facto was 'in charge' of what we now call Slovenia and Croatia, maybe Bosnia, northern Serbia (Vojvodina, remember Monica Seles, incidentally stabbed by a German!), and appointed The Ban of Croatia?.
Slovenia (except for a tiny corner in the northeast) was always under the Austrians. Northern Croatia was under the Hungarians. Dalmatia and Istria were also under the Austrians.
I could be wrong, and Niccolo may need to correct me. but my understanding of the dual monarchy/empire of Austro-Hungary after 1847 and the Kossuth matter, was that Hungary de facto was 'in charge' of what we now call Slovenia and Croatia, maybe Bosnia, northern Serbia (Vojvodina, remember Monica Seles, incidentally stabbed by a German!), and appointed The Ban of Croatia?.
Slovenia (except for a tiny corner in the northeast) was always under the Austrians. Northern Croatia was under the Hungarians. Dalmatia and Istria were also under the Austrians.