I think the "tactical mistake" was the assumption people may actually read the opinions of the justices and understand it's implications, and I'm not just talking about the blue-hair land whales threatening a "sexual boycott" and who constantly harp on about "democracy".
Richard Bari's/People's Pundit routinely finds people claim they su…
I think the "tactical mistake" was the assumption people may actually read the opinions of the justices and understand it's implications, and I'm not just talking about the blue-hair land whales threatening a "sexual boycott" and who constantly harp on about "democracy".
Richard Bari's/People's Pundit routinely finds people claim they support Roe, but almost inevitably will misunderstand what it means because they also claim to be against aspects of abortion that Roe legalized.
I think the "tactical mistake" was the assumption people may actually read the opinions of the justices and understand it's implications, and I'm not just talking about the blue-hair land whales threatening a "sexual boycott" and who constantly harp on about "democracy".
Richard Bari's/People's Pundit routinely finds people claim they support Roe, but almost inevitably will misunderstand what it means because they also claim to be against aspects of abortion that Roe legalized.