It can, but not with the practices instituted by the Rockefeller Foundation spread since the 40's and 50's, which now have control of the universities and ministries of agriculture, and which are now being sancified through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rules on social credit for investment.
Soil can only be regenerated through the practices big ag deplores and works 24/7/365 to eradicate.
Although there are methods that would be lasting, I think treeless agriculture is the problem.
What has worked (that which grows soil fertility) for a very long time is what I call natural succession - agriculture ends this process.
Then on a more serious issue people who aren't directly connected to the food they eat are now dependent on agriculture and the various influences that effect the scheme.
The question is: How did or does nature compensate for a species, or even a colony of species die out for any number of reasons? Adaptation or entirely new species establish in the void - natural succession. Trees are the climax of the process.
Regen ag will last longer, but will still fail at some point because of human societal responses.
Can't top soil be regenerated though?
It can, but not with the practices instituted by the Rockefeller Foundation spread since the 40's and 50's, which now have control of the universities and ministries of agriculture, and which are now being sancified through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rules on social credit for investment.
Soil can only be regenerated through the practices big ag deplores and works 24/7/365 to eradicate.
Can you or Rick Larson send some literature my way on where you inform yourselves on agricultural issues, I'd be very grateful.
I am listening to this interview, not finished with it yet so you can get a head of me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX6eoxxoWKI&t=2854s
The book Permaculture A Designers' Manual is what jolted me out of my lethargy, then I began to accumulate the books it references.
I am now reading the book Power by Heinberg.
Perhaps this one, 'Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation':
https://b-ok.cc/book/689139/8545cb
I was first formed through one book, 'How The Other Half Dies', available here:
https://b-ok.cc/book/2437635/79a854
Hope this helps
Although there are methods that would be lasting, I think treeless agriculture is the problem.
What has worked (that which grows soil fertility) for a very long time is what I call natural succession - agriculture ends this process.
Then on a more serious issue people who aren't directly connected to the food they eat are now dependent on agriculture and the various influences that effect the scheme.
Can you explain what you mean about treeless ag and natural succession? The benefits in particular
The question is: How did or does nature compensate for a species, or even a colony of species die out for any number of reasons? Adaptation or entirely new species establish in the void - natural succession. Trees are the climax of the process.
Regen ag will last longer, but will still fail at some point because of human societal responses.
You should study how humans have responded in the high food production years and the relationship to why these responses guaranteed failure.