Vice-versa. I already left a comment down below. You can keep pretending that it's always NATO, and that NATO tends to plot against NATO, and that NATO is responsible for everything. But, unfortunately, keeping your head in the sand on that there's actors other than NATO out there too only makes you blind to any proceedings when it is, i…
Vice-versa. I already left a comment down below. You can keep pretending that it's always NATO, and that NATO tends to plot against NATO, and that NATO is responsible for everything. But, unfortunately, keeping your head in the sand on that there's actors other than NATO out there too only makes you blind to any proceedings when it is, in fact, not NATO.
You also forgot to ask yourself, who benefits. Because NATO is certainly not benefiting. So it can't be NATO.
P.S. In case you haven't noticed, the idea of joining NATO was the FIRST point Ze has publicly "conceded" during negotiations.
Vice-versa. I already left a comment down below. You can keep pretending that it's always NATO, and that NATO tends to plot against NATO, and that NATO is responsible for everything. But, unfortunately, keeping your head in the sand on that there's actors other than NATO out there too only makes you blind to any proceedings when it is, in fact, not NATO.
You also forgot to ask yourself, who benefits. Because NATO is certainly not benefiting. So it can't be NATO.
P.S. In case you haven't noticed, the idea of joining NATO was the FIRST point Ze has publicly "conceded" during negotiations.
Thank you NATO spokesman.
If the USA is still part of NATO , then it was NATO